• Reducing regulatory burden during COVID-19 – important update from TEQSA

    I am writing to advise you of steps that TEQSA is taking to reduce regulatory burden while you grapple with the challenges brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic.  

    We are committed to supporting your efforts as you respond and adapt to these challenges, and seek to minimise their impact on your students, staff and operations.

    TEQSA has a range of strategies to support you, including:

    • ongoing flexibility with regard to limitations on online delivery to international students (requirements 8.19 and 8.20 of the National Code 2018); and similar flexibility in attendance requirements related to ELICOS and Foundation Program providers.
    • supporting providers moving to online delivery of courses to students in Australia or offshore through provision of advice, guidance and access to material relating to maintenance of quality of learning and student wellbeing in an online setting.
    • extending the period of provider registration and course accreditation, thereby deferring the need for renewal applications.
    • extending the timeframes for: lodgement of applications (by shortening the 6 month before expiry requirement); responses to proposed decisions or other actions; and reporting against conditions currently imposed.
    • minimising and deferring requests for information and notifications.

    Clearly not all these options will be relevant to your situation or circumstances, and undoubtedly there will be additional suggestions you will have for TEQSA to consider. 

    Please be assured that we will engage directly with you over the next few weeks to discuss and develop options relevant to your context and cycle of regulatory assessments. In the meantime, please speak with your case manager if you have immediate questions you wish TEQSA to address. TEQSA will establish and continually update FAQs on its website based on the common questions received from providers.

    TEQSA is working closely with other government agencies to seek to maximise the effectiveness of your response and to support your efforts to remain registered, open and compliant with the Higher Education Standards Framework, National Code, ELICOS Standards and Foundation Program Standards.  We are pleased to be meeting with your peak bodies in the next few days to explore what more we can do to support the higher education sector. We will also be working with professional accreditation bodies in an effort to minimise your administrative burden.

    Please continue to monitor and follow the latest advice from government via www.australia.gov.au. The latest information and updates from TEQSA are on our website at www.teqsa.gov.au/covid-19.

    We look forward to constructive engagement and open discussion with you.

    Yours sincerely

    Professor Nick Saunders AO
    Chief Commissioner and Acting Chief Executive Officer
    Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency

    Last updated:
  • Engagement with professional bodies

    TEQSA and industry professional accreditation bodies with links to the higher education sector have a mutual interest in maintaining and improving quality in the provision of Australian higher education.

    We have agreed that the following principles should guide our engagement with industry professional accreditation bodies:

    • the development of a complementary approach to course accreditation processes and requirements
    • the use of professional bodies as a source of expert advice
    • the sharing of information with professional bodies to inform our regulatory activity and to protect the interests of students and the higher education sector
    • encouraging alignment of professional outcomes with learning outcome requirements of the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF)
    • fostering communication between TEQSA and professional bodies regarding each other’s respective roles.

    We are currently working with a sample of bodies responsible for regulating and/or accrediting TEQSA-accredited programs. Our primary aim will be to explore the possibility of complementary and streamlined accreditation processes.

    Additionally, we are building relationships with a broad range of bodies that have a statutory responsibility for:

    • regulating a profession
    • accrediting related professional programs.

    For example, professional registration and accreditation bodies in medical or engineering fields.

    As a first step in this process, we have prepared a set of Information Guidelines that specify the Commonwealth, State or Territory authorities we may share higher education information with under Sections 189 and 194 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act).

    Industry Professional Accreditation Quality Assurance Agency agreements

    TEQSA has signed Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with the following industry professional accreditation bodies, to facilitate the sharing of information and reduce regulatory burden on higher education providers through joint and streamlined approaches to assessment.

    To speak to us about our MOUs, contact: comms@teqsa.gov.au

    Departments, agencies and peak bodies

    Organisation

    Date of signing

    Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission   13 November 2013
    Overseas Students Ombudsman 17 January 2014
    English Australia 22 March 2016
    Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) 7 July 2016
    Department of Education and Training 14 October 2016
    Independent Tertiary Education Council Australia (ITECA) (formerly ACPET) 8 February 2017
    Australian Council of Professions (Professions Australia) 20 February 2017
    Independent Higher Education Australia (IHEA) (formerly the Council of Private Higher Education) 23 February 2017
    Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) 6 March 2017

     Education

    Organisation

    Date of signing

    Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership   7 October 2015
    Queensland College of Teachers 1 September 2016
    Teachers Registration Board of South Australia 21 November 2016
    Victorian Institute of Teaching 9 January 2017
    National ELT Accreditation Scheme Ltd (NEAS) 20 February 2017
    Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority 6 March 2017
    Universities Admissions Centre (UAC) 20 September 2017
    National Union of Students (NUS) 21 September 2017
    Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations Incorporated 10 November 2017
    Council of International Students Australia (CISA) 29 November 2017
    National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Postgraduate Associations
    (NATSIPA)
    30 November 2017
    Union of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students 9 July 2018
    National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Higher Education Consortium
    (NATSIHEC)
    16 November 2018
    Teachers Registration Board Northern Territory 14 December 2018 
    Teachers Registration Board Tasmania 17 December 2018 
    Council of Australasian University Leaders in Learning and Teaching (CAULLT) 2 September 2019
    Teachers Registration Board South Australia 11 September 2019

    Health 

    Organisation

    Date of signing

    Australian Medical Council 13 July 2016
    Speech Pathology Australia 5 December 2016
    Australasian Osteopathic Accreditation Council 13 February 2017
    Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council 21 February 2017
    Occupational Therapy Council (Australia and New Zealand) 8 March 2017
    Australian Pharmacy Council 7 April 2017
    Optometry Council of Australia and New Zealand  1 August 2017
    Australian Psychology Accreditation Council  7 December 2017
    Australian and New Zealand Podiatry Accreditation Council 29 May 2018
    Australian OHS Education Accreditation Board (Safety Institute of Australian Ltd) 8 August 2018
    Health Professions Accreditation Collaborative Forum 8 November 2018
    Australian Physiotherapy Council 18 December 2018
    Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) 1 February 2019
    Australian Society of Dermal Clinicians (ASDC) 18 March 2019
    Australian Dental Council 25 March 2019
    Council on Chiropractic Education Australasia (CCEA) 8 May 2019
    Audiology Australia (AudA) 22 August 2019

    Industry 

    Organisation

    Date of signing

    CPA Australia   9 April 2015
    Engineers Australia 30 June 2016
    The International Centre of Excellence in Tourism and Hospitality
    Education
    7 September 2016
    Australian Institute of Project Management (AIPM) 7 October 2016
    Australasian Veterinary Board Council Inc. 25 October 2016
    Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors (AIQS) 28 October 2016
    Financial Planning Education Council (FPEC) /
    Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA)
    27 April 2018
    Safety Institute of Australia (SIA) 8 October 2018
    Australasian Supply Chain Institute (ASCI)  18 October 2018
    Australian Community Workers Association (ACWA) 19 February 2019
    Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA) 6 March 2019
    Architects Accreditation Council of Australia (AACA) 22 August 2019
    Last updated:
  • TEQSA Conference 2019 – graphic recordings of plenary sessions

    The graphic recordings of each plenary session from the 2019 TEQSA Annual Conference are available below.

    Day 1 (27 November 2019)

    State of the Sector 2019

    Anthony McClaran, TEQSA CEO

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 State of the Sector 2019 session

    State of Australia 2019

    George Megalogenis, Journalist

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 State of Australia session

    Diverse Partnerships Driving Quality

    Chair: Craig Robertson

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Diverse Partnerships Driving Quality session

    Partnerships and Regulation

    Professor Jane den Hollander, AO

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Partnerships and Regulation session

    The Higher Education Standards Panel: Partnerships with the Sector in Driving Quality

    Emeritus Professor Ian O’Connor, AC

    Professor Kerri-Lee Krause

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Higher Education Standards Panel session

    Day 2 (28 November 2019)

    Students as Partners

    Chair: Julie Moss

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Students as Partners session

    Partnerships and Quality in Rural and Remote Higher Education

    Chair: Professor Helen Bartlett

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Partnerships and Quality in Rural and Remote Higher Education session

    Industry Professional Partnerships Driving Quality Accreditation

    Chair: Dr Christine Ewan

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Industry Professional Partnerships Driving Quality Accreditation session

    Quality Partnerships with Students and Academics Driving Academic Integrity: Contract Cheating

    Chair: Dr James Adonopoulos

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Quality Partnerships with Students and Academics Driving Academic Integrity session

    On Trust

    Emeritus Professor Jamil Salmi

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 On Trust session

    TEQSA's Regulatory Landscape and Partnerships

    Chair: Dr Lin Martin

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 TEQSA's Regulatory Landscape and Partnerships session

    Day 3 (29 November 2019)

    Partnerships and Quality: A Chancellor's Perspective

    Peter Varghese, AO

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Partnerships and Quality - A Chancellor's Perspective session

    Minister for Education Address

    The Hon Dan Tehan MP

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Minister for Education Address session

    English Language, ELICOS, CRICOS and the National Code Driving Quality

    Chair: Brett Blacker

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 English Language, ELICOS, CRICOS and the National Code Driving Quality session

    Case Managers and Questions

    Chair: Dr Michael Tomlinson

    Image displaying key themes of the TEQSA Conference 2019 Case Managers and Questions session

    Last updated:
  • Public interest disclosures

    TEQSA is committed to the appropriate handling of public interest disclosures and to the provision of appropriate support for those who make a disclosure. Our procedures for disclosures under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 are available below:

    A public official who is not satisfied with the outcome of an internal investigation or believes that TEQSA did not appropriately deal with a disclosure may pursue a complaint with the Commonwealth Ombudsman. The Ombudsman may also investigate matters referred directly to the Ombudsman.

    Last updated:
  • Acknowledgement of Country

    TEQSA acknowledges the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to land, waters and community. We pay our respects to their Cultures, Country and Elders past, present and emerging.

    Last updated:
  • Syme Business School Pty Ltd

    Application for registration and course accreditation

    Decision:

    Rejected

    Date of decision:

    8 May 2019

    Main reasons for decision:

    The decisions were made on the basis that TEQSA was not satisfied that Syme Business School Pty Ltd ​​​​meets the following provisions of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015:  

    • Standard 3.1.2 in relation to the design and course content of the GDMA
    • Standard 5.1.3 in relation to course approval processes, specifically the level of overarching academic scrutiny of course content
    • Standards 6.1.3 and 6.2.1 in relation to corporate governance and corporate monitoring and accountability.
    Review stage:  
    Last updated:
  • National Institute of Integrative Medicine Ltd

    Application for registration and course accreditation

    Decision:

    Rejected

    Date of decision:

    9 May 2018

    Main reasons for decision:

    The decisions were made on the basis that TEQSA was not satisfied that the National Institute of Integrative Medicine Ltd (NIIM) meets the following provisions of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015:

    • Standards 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 of Part A in relation to NIIM’s academic staff
    • Standards 4.2.2 of Part A in relation to the research and research training at NIIM
    • Standard 1.4.5 of Part A in relation to the ability of students at NIIM to demonstrate the learning outcomes specified for the Master of Integrative Medicine (Research).
    Review stage:  
    Last updated:
  • TEQSA Conference 2018

    Presentation materials

    Keynote and concurrent session presentations from the 2018 conference are available from Higher Ed Services' website.

    Conference presentation videos

    Conference photos

    Last updated:
  • Checking provider registration or course accreditation

    All registered higher education providers are listed on TEQSA’s National Register.

    It is quick, free and easy to check a provider’s registration by searching the National Register on this website.

    In addition to a provider’s registration information, the register also lists courses a provider is accredited by TEQSA to deliver if they do not have self-accrediting authority. Please note, Universities and University Colleges are usually able to accredit their own courses. These courses are not listed in the National Register.

    Other information on the National Register includes:

    • the providers registration category (Australian University, University College, Institute of Higher Education, and Overseas University)
    • how long they are registered for (this period cannot exceed 7 years)
    • whether they can self-accredit their own courses
    • the date courses must be re-accredited
    • any regulatory action we have taken
    • links to providers' Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching page, which allows you to compare undergraduate and postgraduate coursework, student experience and graduate employment outcomes. 

    Unregistered entities

    Entities that advertise a higher education award when they are not registered with TEQSA are known as unregistered entities.

    Unregistered entities undermine Australia’s higher education system, because the quality has not been assured by TEQSA.

    These entities can also have detrimental impacts on students who unwittingly enrol and undertake courses, with the expectation of receiving a recognised higher education award at completion.

    Students should always check whether a higher education provider is registered with TEQSA by searching the National Register.

    To find out more, including a list of known unregistered entities, visit entities that are not registered higher education providers.

    Providers delivering courses to international students

    Higher education providers can only deliver courses to international students if they are registered on the Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS). TEQSA assesses applications for inclusion on CRICOS and ensures higher education courses delivered to international students are of high quality.

    Last updated: