Guide for CRICOS providers undertaking an independent external audit
Documents
Purpose
This guide sets out TEQSA’s expectations for the independent external audit (external audit) process for providers with self-accrediting authority (SAA) applying to renew their CRICOS registration.
Standard 11.4 of the National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018 (National Code) requires providers with SAA to undertake an external audit no more than 18 months prior to applying to renew their CRICOS registration. The purpose of this guide is to support providers in meeting this requirement, provide advice on best practice for this process, and highlight commons issues TEQSA has observed in this area.
External audit report
The results of the external audit should be outlined in a report (audit report) that includes the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the auditors. The audit report informs TEQSA’s assessment of the application for re-registration.
The report should:
- outline the scope of the audit, specifying what the audit will include and exclude
- outline the methodologies of the audit (such as policies and internal reviews, interviews of staff, verifying student files) and provide a rationale explaining why the methodology is fit-for-purpose
- identify the policies, procedures and processes used by the provider to manage compliance with the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS Act) and National Code
- assess the provider’s implementation of its policies, procedures, and processes against the requirements of the ESOS Act and National Code
- detail areas of non-compliance, risks of non-compliance, and the risks that arise from these areas of non-compliance.
When applying for renewal of CRICOS registration, providers should include an action plan, detailing the actions required to address any areas of non-compliance identified by the external audit, who is responsible for these actions and when they will be completed.
TEQSA recognises that providers may not always have completed all elements of their action plan prior to applying to TEQSA for re-registration. However, TEQSA expects providers to submit evidence of their capacity, resources, and approach to implementing the action plan within a reasonable time frame.
The audit report also offers an opportunity for providers to gain a better understanding of their regulatory obligations and to improve their internal quality assurance processes. Furthermore, the audit report and the provider’s response to the findings in the report should enhance the quality of education and overall experience for overseas students at that institution.
Identified issues
In the past, not all audit reports submitted to TEQSA have provided us with sufficient clarity to determine whether a provider is compliant with the requirements of the National Code. This can result from deficiencies in the external audit process or the report itself where:
- the scope of the external audit is not clearly outlined or is not sufficiently broad to demonstrate compliance with all requirements of the National Code
- the methodology of the external audit is not clearly explained to show how findings were made
- findings of compliance are made without reference to evidence
- findings of compliance are made without explaining how the evidence demonstrates compliance
- findings of compliance are made on the basis that a policy or procedure exists, without assessing whether it is fit-for-purpose and meets the requirements of all applicable National Code Standards
- responsibilities for key remedial actions are not clearly specified.
An audit report with one or more of these issues may result in TEQSA being unable to be satisfied that all standards have been met. In these circumstances TEQSA will request further evidence from the provider.
What TEQSA will look for
TEQSA’s ability to efficiently assess a provider’s application for renewal of CRICOS registration is greatly assisted by a high-quality audit report. A high-quality report will include the following key information:
- the policies, procedures, processes and supporting documentation that the auditor has considered
- the basis for which the policies, procedures, processes and supporting documentation were selected as representative of the state of compliance with each Standard
- the types of evidence, including samples, assessed
- the findings of non-compliance or risks of non-compliance and how the provider’s action plan will fully address these risks.
When reviewing an audit report, TEQSA assesses the provider’s compliance with each of the 11 Standards of the National Code. The table at Figure 1 outlines, for each of the Standards, the key considerations and evidence that TEQSA recommends should be considered by the auditor to inform their assessment.
TEQSA considers Standards 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 as critical to ensuring the quality of education delivered to overseas students. As such, TEQSA recommends that the external audit closely review these Standards and their associated risks to ensure each is fully satisfied.
TEQSA welcomes the diversity of educational delivery across the sector and recognises that the requirements of the ESOS Act and National Code can be met in different ways according to the circumstances of the provider. TEQSA’s approach is to ensure that the requirements of the ESOS Act and National Code are met, not to prescribe how they are met. If you are preparing an application for re-registration and are unsure about the forms of evidence to include, please contact the ESOS/CRICOS team at cricos@teqsa.gov.au.
Figure 1 – Key considerations and evidence for external audit
Key considerations |
Key evidence |
Standard 1 |
|
Marketing and recruitment policies, procedures, and processes that ensure the accuracy of:
|
Marketing materials, including:
|
Standard 2 |
|
Information about:
Additional supporting documentation may include:
|
Marketing materials, including:
Sample of a valid number of student files to assess the consistent application of guidelines for:
|
Standard 3 |
|
Documents such as:
|
Sample of a valid number of student files, including under 18s if applicable, to assess:
|
Standard 4 |
|
Documents that demonstrate compliance with the agent recruitment and management process, including:
|
|
Standard 5 |
|
Policies, procedures, and processes relating to under 18 student admissions, provider transfers, managing welfare arrangements for younger overseas students, working with children checks and/or other regulatory requirements relating to child welfare and protection:
|
Sample of a valid number of under 18 student files:
|
Standard 6 |
|
Policy, procedures, processes, and information relating to student academic and non-academic support, managing student critical incidents and emergencies, ESOS training:
|
|
Standard 7 |
|
Policy, procedures, and processes for overseas students transferring to and from the provider (including for under 18 students):
|
|
Standard 8 |
|
Policy, procedures, and processes for course progression and monitoring academic progress and attendance, if applicable, managing students at risk, course rules and enrolment period extensions:
|
|
Standard 9 |
|
Policy, procedures and processes for deferrals, leave of absence, or provider-initiated suspensions and cancellations:
|
|
Standard 10 |
|
Policy, procedures and processes for complaints and appeals
|
|
Standard 11 |
|
Policy and procedures to govern course design and delivery in alignment with requirements relating to third-party provider arrangements (TPA), mode of study, including limitations on online and work-based learning, course duration, full-time study load and the management of student capacity:
|
|
Document history
Version # |
Date |
Key changes |
---|---|---|
1.0 |
14 October 2022 |
|