• Extension of accreditation 7 December 2021

    Provider: Kontea Pty Ltd

    Course: Undergraduate Certificate in Cost Estimation for Residential Construction

    Extension of accreditation period

    Report on extension of accreditation of four higher education courses of study offered by Kontea Pty Ltd

    On 7 December 2021, a delegate of TEQSA extended, under section 57A of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the accreditation of the following courses offered by Kontea Pty Ltd:

    • Undergraduate Certificate in Basics of Construction Management from 31 December 2021 to 4 September 2024.
    • Undergraduate Certificate in Residential Building Inspection from 31 December 2021 to 4 September 2024.
    • Undergraduate Certificate in Building Information Modelling for Construction Management from 31 December 2021 to 4 September 2024.
    • Undergraduate Certificate in Cost Estimation for Residential Construction from 31 December 2021 to 4 September 2024.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision consistent with the principles set out in TEQSA's policy on extensions to the period of provider registration or course accreditation, including an assessment of risks associated with the extension.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID3593
  • Accreditation 14 December 2021

    Provider: Morling College Ltd

    Course: Graduate Certificate of Professional Supervision

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Morling College Ltd

    On 14 December 2021, a delegate of TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following course offered by Morling College Ltd, for a period of 7 (seven) years until 14 December 2028:

    • Graduate Certificate of Professional Supervision

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the course submitted by Morling College Ltd for accreditation meets the applicable Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID3594
  • Accreditation 21 October 2021

    Provider: Sheridan College Inc.

    Course: Rejected - Bachelor of Laws (Honours)

    Course accreditation

    Report on application for accreditation of one higher education course of study by Sheridan College Inc.

    On 21 October 2021, a delegate of TEQSA rejected, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the application by Sheridan College Inc. for accreditation of the following course:

    • Bachelor of Laws (Honours)

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was not satisfied that the course submitted by Sheridan College Inc. complies with the following provisions of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021:

      1. Standard 1.4.1 of Part A, in relation to the lack of demonstrated consistency between the specified unit learning outcomes and the level of the qualification awarded.
      2. Standards 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 of Part A, in relation to:
        1. The failure of the constructive course alignment to demonstrate how the methods of assessment are consistent with, and demonstrate achievement of, Honours level learning outcomes upon completion of the course as distinct from Bachelor level learning outcomes.
        2. The application documentation inadequately demonstrating how all specified units of study within the Bachelor of Laws (Honours) course will contribute to, and confirm achievement of, Honours level learning outcomes as distinct from Bachelor level learning outcomes.
        3. The embedded structure of the course, as evidenced in the application documentation, and the extent to which it adequately ensures that learning outcomes are consistent with both Bachelor and Bachelor Honours qualification levels and therefore that the grades awarded reflect the respective levels of student attainment.
      3. Standard 1.5.3 of Part A, based on the lack of differentiation between Bachelor and Bachelor Honours unit learning outcomes, and the extent to which the specified unit learning outcomes can be considered consistent with the higher expectations inherent in the Bachelor Honours level classification in the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF).
      4. Standards 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 of Part A, as it is not evident that the course content and learning activities engage with the advanced knowledge and inquiry consistent with an AQF level 8 qualification, nor that the arrangement of teaching and learning activities will foster progressive and coherent achievement of the AQF level 8 course learning outcomes as they are shared with the AQF level 7 Bachelor of Laws course.
      5. Standards 5.1.2 and 5.1.3 of Part A, given the absence of consideration of the Bachelor of Laws (Honours) course by the Academic Council as part of Sheridan's internal course approvals process, which indicates the course may have not been subject to the required overarching academic scrutiny that ensures course approval process were applied consistently to the LLB (Hons) and is competent to assess the design, delivery and assessment of the course.
    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID3595
  • Accreditation 21 October 2021

    Provider: Sheridan College Inc.

    Course: Bachelor of Laws

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Sheridan College Inc.

    On 21 October 2021, a delegate of TEQSA:

    • accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following course offered by Sheridan College Inc., for a period of seven years until 21 October 2028:
      • Bachelor of Laws
    • imposed, under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, 3 conditions on the accreditation of the Bachelor of Laws.

    Condition 1: Constructive course alignment

    By 31 January 2022, Sheridan College Inc. is to submit to TEQSA constructive course alignment for the Bachelor of Laws course which specifies and maps all course learning outcomes, unit learning outcomes and methods of assessment in order to effectively demonstrate that the methods of assessment are consistent with the learning outcomes being assessed and are capable of confirming that all specified learning outcomes at both the unit and course level will be achieved on completion of the course of study.

    Condition 2: Formative assessments

    Prior to delivering the Bachelor of Laws course, Sheridan College Inc. must satisfy TEQSA that the methods of assessment used within the Bachelor of Laws include formative assessments designed to provide students with the timely feedback required to assist in the achievement of learning outcomes. To provide this assurance, Sheridan College Inc. is to submit to TEQSA updated unit outlines for all units within the Bachelor of Laws course no less than 60 days prior to the commencement of teaching. Each updated unit outline will clearly specify the methods of formative assessment within each unit, and detail how and when feedback on formative assessments will be provided to students.

    Condition 3: Professional Accreditation

    Sheridan College Inc. is not permitted to market or enrol students into the Bachelor of Laws course until the Legal Practice Board of Western Australia approves the course as an academic qualification for admission to the legal profession in Western Australia, and documented evidence has been submitted to TEQSA.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to the accreditation of the course is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as Sheridan is at risk of not complying with the following Threshold Standards:

      1. Standards 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 and Standards 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 of Part A, as the constructive course alignment does not assure all assessment tasks are consistent with, and capable of confirming achievement of, all specified learning outcomes, nor that the full course content and learning activities engage with the requisite knowledge and inquiry consistent with the level of study and expected learning outcomes, and relatedly, that the teaching and learning activities have been adequately arranged to foster progressive and coherent achievement of learning outcomes.
      2. Standard 1.3.3 of Part A, as it is not evident the methods of formative assessment will provide students with the timely feedback that assists in their achievement of learning outcomes.
      3. Standard 3.1.5 of Part A, as the course is yet to be approved as an academic qualification for admission into the legal profession by the relevant professional body, which is a requirement for graduates to be eligible to practice in the field.

    Application to withdraw conditions

    In accordance with section 53 of the TEQSA Act, TEQSA may vary or revoke a condition imposed on the accreditation of a higher education course of study, either on its own initiative, or upon application by the provider for variation or revocation.

    Condition
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID3596
  • Accreditation 1 December 2021

    Provider: The Cairnmillar Institute

    Course: Doctor of Philosophy

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by The Cairnmillar Institute

    On 1 December 2021, TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following course offered by The Cairnmillar Institute, for a period of seven years until 1 December 2028:

    • Doctor of Philosophy.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the course submitted by The Cairnmillar Institute for accreditation meets the applicable Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID3597
  • Accreditation 21 December 2021

    Provider: Chisholm Institute (formerly Chisholm Institute of Technical and Further Education)

    Course: Bachelor of Psychology

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Chisholm Institute

    On 21 December 2021, a delegate of TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by Chisholm Institute, for a period of seven years until 21 December 2028:

    • Bachelor of Psychology
    • Associate Degree of Psychology

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by Chisholm Institute for accreditation meet the applicable Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID3598
  • Accreditation 21 December 2021

    Provider: Chisholm Institute (formerly Chisholm Institute of Technical and Further Education)

    Course: Associate Degree of Psychology

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Chisholm Institute

    On 21 December 2021, a delegate of TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by Chisholm Institute, for a period of seven years until 21 December 2028:

    • Bachelor of Psychology
    • Associate Degree of Psychology

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by Chisholm Institute for accreditation meet the applicable Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID3599
  • Accreditation 21 December 2021

    Provider: Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd

    Course: Graduate Certificate in Artificial Intelligence

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd

    On 21 December 2021, a delegate of TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd until the dates set out below:

    • Graduate Certificate in Cyber Security, until 28 November 2024
    • Graduate Certificate in Artificial Intelligence, until 29 June 2027.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd for accreditation meet the applicable Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID3600
  • Accreditation 21 December 2021

    Provider: Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd

    Course: Graduate Certificate in Cyber Security

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd

    On 21 December 2021, a delegate of TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd until the dates set out below:

    • Graduate Certificate in Cyber Security, until 28 November 2024
    • Graduate Certificate in Artificial Intelligence, until 29 June 2027.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd for accreditation meet the applicable Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID3601